otoh we could kill someone that has important roles no?If we lynch someone we at least have a 1/16 chance at killing the mafia, assuming there is just one.
Also, if we kill an innocent, then we know who it is not which narrows the field.
The fewer people we have, yes, the less the mafia has to kill to win but also the more information the innocents have to make their pick.
So my conclusion is that it is stupid not to kill someone on day one because then we have a 0/16 chance of getting any information and the innocents are just closer to losing the game.
Generally when someone has a really important role and is going to imminently get lynched, they tell everything. If that role is mafia, they get forced into a corner and tangle themselves in a web of lies.otoh we could kill someone that has important roles no?
Tbh, I'd play dumb if I was scum. Especially since it's a first game and nobody knows my prior experience.vote Alex Taylor because you're smart and I don't trust you because of it
That is why I spelled it out since we're not all at the same levels. My normal site mod would ignore that. You can voluntarily role claim, but it would not be beneficial to do so.Oh I assumed from this that if we lynched the wrong person, ISIS numbers would grow.
People can still voluntarily role claim, right?
Mafia would want us to take the odds of mislynching 15/16... It would help them narrow down the field of people they need to kill. I say we don't lynch anybody today, if we kill somebody we get almost 0 information and just help out the mafia. Not worth to kill lynch anyone tonight.Im so confused. we need clarification because I was under the impression there was a set number of mafia/ISIS/killers whatever and it was the job of the fixed number of NATO nations to use their special powers/abilities to working conjunction with the neutrals/towns/innocents to determine who the mafia/ISIS/killers were and lynch them.
Maybe if I was masked properly the diplomat thing wouldn't be an issue.Vote Robert E Lee because he needs to be a diplomat so we can have an FA party @OO
Also cuz he voted IC who is bae
Vote Patrick MacFarlane because he seems very adamant about mislynching somebody. Why would he want us to run the risk of killing someone innocent other than to further his own agenda.If we lynch someone we at least have a 1/16 chance at killing the mafia, assuming there is just one.
Also, if we kill an innocent, then we know who it is not which narrows the field.
The fewer people we have, yes, the less the mafia has to kill to win but also the more information the innocents have to make their pick.
So my conclusion is that it is stupid not to kill someone on day one because then we have a 0/16 chance of getting any information and the innocents are just closer to losing the game.
You can't unvote yourselfunvote
Patrick MacFarlane
Yeah this seems quite convincing.Vote Patrick MacFarlane because he seems very adamant about mislynching somebody. Why would he want us to run the risk of killing someone innocent other than to further his own agenda.
Yeah that makes sense. Changing vote back to GalacticManatee.inb4 jester bait
Also, a random lynch could help but let's assume you kill a non-mafia member, was it worth it in the end? Mafia still win at the end of the day. Vote @Patrick MacFarlane for many of the reasons noted by nerddragon.I unvote Bear and vote GalacticManatee because @GalacticManatee needs to come out of hiding.
PMFs argument for day 1 lynching doesn't sound unreasonable to me. To not lynch would be to effectively give the mafia an extra night.