Depends on how the fire is set up. If it burns slowly around you it can be quite painful - burning the feet until you pass out or reach combustion level of heat.with burning you'd lose consciousness quite quickly. with drowning you are there till the end.
but the smoke will render you unconscious.Depends on how the fire is set up. If it burns slowly around you it can be quite painful - burning the feet until you pass out or reach combustion level of heat.
I guess that's why people use city squares - to have a lot of open air and ventilation. It really depends on the set up and skill / evilness of the executioner. Sometimes the burnee (is that even a word?) was hanged above the fire stake. That way s/he'd be grilled at first until reaching combustion. But we should test the theory if a person would lose consciousness quickly due to lack of oxygen. Any volunteers?but the smoke will render you unconscious.
I heard a talk on the radio by someone who was caught in a tsunami. She said drowning was definitely a very painful way to die. That's why a lot of people who have drowned have such an agonized look on their faces. She didn't die, but passed out from the pain eventually.Drowning would be less painful you would think so I'll take it.
That is a strange fetish. Would you rather be impaled instead?for some reason I'd like to die experiencing extreme pain like burning alive. If I was definitely going to die, I'd pick burning.
Simple. Don't choose and you won't dieI honestly can't decide. Both options are terrible: Either you die in immense pain (burning) or you die struggling/fighting to survive (drowning).
nah I think I'd still pick burning. And I don't know if it's necessarily a fetish. It's all irrelevant anyway cause I'll be dead and won't remember. But at least I'll die having an extreme perceptual experience, like a last hurrah to my existence as a life formThat is a strange fetish. Would you rather be impaled instead?