War on Terrorism Mafia Night 5

Infinite Citadel said:
I don't think it's a mislynch that causes people to switch, but rather a vigilante kill. Granted, without any more info from role players wrt Woot's poisoning, we would be shooting in the dark :v

We *could* start a vote to lynch one of the inactive/lurkers and make them come out and defend themselves rather. We either lynch an inactive, or we get some info in their defense. We need more info, and we have to get it somehow imo.
Click to expand...
True, more info would reduce the suspect list

Vote Best Korea

 
I agree with IC, if we start a vote it could cause Info to come into light. Though which of the inactives do we choose? Or is there even a stratigic method to the vote? 

Vote Lordship 

hes always on the forums as far as I can tell but has yet to speak in this game. Maybe it's time we pressure him a little? Try and get some info? 

 
Infinite Citadel said:
I don't think it's a mislynch that causes people to switch, but rather a vigilante kill. Granted, without any more info from role players wrt Woot's poisoning, we would be shooting in the dark :v

We *could* start a vote to lynch one of the inactive/lurkers and make them come out and defend themselves rather. We either lynch an inactive, or we get some info in their defense. We need more info, and we have to get it somehow imo.
Click to expand...
As I'm part of the inactive list, here's all the info that I have.

I wasn't really active the past few days because of schoolwork, even though I still checked this thread. I'm a third party country, Lebanon. My goal is to survive this game, and I have no special powers. There's no point in lynching me or killing me otherwise. I realized that it would be better to not add as much to the discussion, as all it does is make me look like a target, without much gain in terms of my win.

Personally, I feel that there's a large survivor majority, which can easily be turned into ISIS (the main threat to both survivors and NATO), so I think that we should be more careful about vigilante kills.

Not voting yet until there's more evidence.

 
GalacticManatee said:
I agree with IC, if we start a vote it could cause Info to come into light. Though which of the inactives do we choose? Or is there even a stratigic method to the vote? 

Vote Lordship 

hes always on the forums as far as I can tell but has yet to speak in this game. Maybe it's time we pressure him a little? Try and get some info? 
Click to expand...
yeah I didn't even realize Lordship was playing tbh.

Vote Lordship

 
give me a list of everyone you want prodded and I'll prod them within the next 24 hours.  Tentatively I'll end this game day on Saturday around noon CST.  Those that you asked prodded that do not respond will be modkilled at the conclusion of the day.

 
Wtf I literally just remembered we're playing this game lmao! Idk why you would vote me like I literally forgot that this is even happening

Ty IC for pinging me lol

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thank you for the prod Tiger. And I apologize for my absence 

I don't understand why I was on the suspicion list. Until a couple of days ago I was thinking about this game all wrong because I didn't understand the roles that were in the game and how they were operating. I was speaking from prior knowledge that didn't apply here. I backed off and bandwagoned a vote because I had nothing to add to the game discussion but wanted to keep it moving. 

 
are we really voting lordship up? or are we doing something else?

also,

can i call in another drone strike? :D

 
Back
Top