War on Terrorism Mafia Night 5

The miscommunication, the misread, and the general chattiness of Cenna is somewhat incriminating but not enough for me to want to vote for him. 

 
Guess I'm dead then?  Well i wasn't lying i am russia i do have the ability and I'm a 3rd party NATO and you just killed me 

Id also say bye to bear since he'll be next due to the mafia

 
I guess till I'm officially dead I can chat so I'll say this. Take a look at the ones who jump to vote on someone the minute someone gives an argument incriminating them. If I were in the mafia it'd be my plan to have them all vote on one person unless it's one of them then they can get 2 kills one during the day and one at night Good luck. 

Patrick MacFarlane said:
The miscommunication, the misread, and the general chattiness of Cenna is somewhat incriminating but not enough for me to want to vote for him. 
Click to expand...
I've also never played this before so when I read it I had no clue anything about anything so...........

 
Cenna is officially dead as of this point.  I'll give the scene on my next break while at work.  Those of you that have night actions may begin talking if you are allowed to(you know who you are) and the rest of you just relax.  It'll be day in 2 days.  Just as a quick note Cenna really is 3rd party power survivor jack of all trades. Just don't have time to type more right now.

 
Infinite Citadel said:
Vote Cenna.

I'm trying to think who would pick NerdDragon at the start, and it was either random or it was from someone that knew him/had history. Cenna/Nerd have a lot of interaction in the spam forums, and Nerd had voted for Cenna last time. The other option I could think of would be Natinator, but he hasn't posted all that much. 
Click to expand...
I would totes pick someone I don't have a history with, if I thought he/she was someone opposing me :P

Also, I wanna be a Windrunner

 
It's about to start.  Sorry I got sick and wasn't on the computer this week.

The NATO ALLIES had a busy night.  There was a drone strike called in that killed off Oman(Robert E. Lee 3rd party neutral).  This has caused another nation to switch to ISIS.  While this took place, authorities arrested Woot for trying to enter their country.  During the course of their interregation Woot died from swallowing a pill. Woot was an ISIS recruiter(mafia member).

Meanwhile Isis decided that Lord Darian (3rd party Turkey) was getting too close to them for comfort and killed him off during the night.  

I'll edit the opening post my next break.  I gotta go back to work right now

 
Wellll.. that was an informative night. We did get a lot of leads.

Uhhh someone killed Rickky. Bear claiming this strike? And why Rickky may I ask?

Woot's death leads to a bit. He seems to bandwagon votes. He voted for Bear and Rickky so that gives me more confidence on Bear. He also voted GalacticManatee so GM could be innocent.

I don't really like the "This has caused another nation to switch to ISIS." bit. That suggests that while we killed one, there's at least two new ones. Idk if woot being recruiter means that he's the only one who can recruit them after deaths. I'm a bit disappointed that they didn't recruit me either, because at 4 innocent deaths, the terrorists are ahead.

We do have to start lynching now before it's too late (yay patriot act?)

Maybe if anyone has any data, this is a good time.

Stupid forums won't let me delete old quotes and I can't edit out in this thread so I'll just leave this here...

(Fixed it for you <3 Rickky)

 
Last edited by a moderator:
how did 2 people die? did a vigilante kill one of them or did jailer kill someone? this not knowing how many types of members in the game is confusing and frustrating.

anywho, we wait to see if anyone has any leads

 
LSU Tiger Josh said:
The NATO ALLIES had a busy night.  There was a drone strike called in that killed off Oman(Robert E. Lee 3rd party neutral). 
Click to expand...
Whoopsies. Thanks Obama

Judging from what went on so far, I have a sneaking suspicion that that this may be a game where town and mafia is in the minority while the neutral is in the majority

 
So it seems like Bear shouldn't vigilante kill anyone (that turns people to ISIS if he guesses wrong), on top of that if Woot died due to someone poisoning him, that person might have some info idk.

 
Idk... we've had bad luck with lynches. Another mislynch could tilt the game to ISIS win. I didn't actually suspect Woot so my instinct is off this time.

ISIS doesn't seem to have an interest in killing me if they haven't yet. I think they're attacking NATO, hunting for the power roles, and it's obvious I'm not one.

I'm third party so as long as I survive the game I win. There's not really much initiative for me to push to lynch someone.

 
Ok so what do we have:

USA - Bear

Unknown:
IC
Japan77
PirateMonkey - seems to be attracting negative attention which is not a mafia-like trait

Dayz

Patrick - still suspicious for trying really hard to lynch on day 1, and the change of tone on Day 2

GalacticManatee - Woot voted for him early on. This doesn't really mean he's innocent, could be that Woot wants to defend his lack od activity. His votes seem to all follow Woot's.

Alex Taylor

Inactive/lurking:
Best Korea
Lordship
johnl023
Natinator - seems eager to play but not really saying much. Suspicious trait.

Not in game?
Flavory

We're looking for at least 2 ISIS. Two of which may have been converted since the recent night so this makes it all very difficult.

It could be entirely that Woot was the only one and we created 2 last night lol.

 
Alex Taylor said:
Ok so what do we have:

USA - Bear

Unknown:
IC
Japan77
PirateMonkey - seems to be attracting negative attention which is not a mafia-like trait

Dayz

Patrick - still suspicious for trying really hard to lynch on day 1, and the change of tone on Day 2

GalacticManatee - Woot voted for him early on. This doesn't really mean he's innocent, could be that Woot wants to defend his lack od activity. His votes seem to all follow Woot's.

Alex Taylor

Inactive/lurking:
Best Korea
Lordship
johnl023
Natinator - seems eager to play but not really saying much. Suspicious trait.

Not in game?
Flavory

We're looking for at least 2 ISIS. Two of which may have been converted since the recent night so this makes it all very difficult.

It could be entirely that Woot was the only one and we created 2 last night lol.
Click to expand...
imo, every Name below the inactive/lurking section doesnt mean Anything To me. as In games like these, Not saying anything is Not an indicator whether someone is evil or not. could simply be town keeping cover, neutral just wanting to survive Or maf keeping cover. too many possibility to risk a kill. from the list, only patrick is slightly suspicious to me

 
Alex Taylor said:
Idk... we've had bad luck with lynches. Another mislynch could tilt the game to ISIS win. I didn't actually suspect Woot so my instinct is off this time.

ISIS doesn't seem to have an interest in killing me if they haven't yet. I think they're attacking NATO, hunting for the power roles, and it's obvious I'm not one.

I'm third party so as long as I survive the game I win. There's not really much initiative for me to push to lynch someone.
Click to expand...
I don't think it's a mislynch that causes people to switch, but rather a vigilante kill. Granted, without any more info from role players wrt Woot's poisoning, we would be shooting in the dark :v

Bear said:
imo, every Name below the inactive/lurking section doesnt mean Anything To me. as In games like these, Not saying anything is Not an indicator whether someone is evil or not. could simply be town keeping cover, neutral just wanting to survive Or maf keeping cover. too many possibility to risk a kill. from the list, only patrick is slightly suspicious to me
Click to expand...
We *could* start a vote to lynch one of the inactive/lurkers and make them come out and defend themselves rather. We either lynch an inactive, or we get some info in their defense. We need more info, and we have to get it somehow imo.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top