Ryan Miller
Active member
A hot topic we have here in the US. This time, it's about minimum wage laws. Most Democrats want it higher, most Republicans want it lower (or sometimes let the companies decide). What do you think?
breaks unions, and there's no legitimate/strong monopoly laws
Creation of anti-monopoly laws, worker's unions
You're dreaming if you think big unions are some of the strongest monopolies in the country. Unions have lost so much of their power in the past 30 years that it's not even funny. And it's not some utopia-esque fairy tale to believe unions help workers. Look at the majority of western countries that have better buying power and less bullshit to deal with.Does nobody see the irony that big unions are some of the strongest monopolies that exist in this country? Just because a cartel is controlling labor instead of oil or internet service doesn't make it a great idea for an efficient economy. Anything a union can do can be done better through law, so if we're dreaming up a perfect system then what's with the unions?
Union is strong monopoly...Only in Massachusetts. Seriously, union power throughout the country has declined massively since the 1960s, and participation in unions is either at or below 10%. There are like 5 states without right to work laws, and to top it off, most people refuse to join unions because it requires them to pay dues. This creates a free-rider problem, and as such, without laws to promote the presence/power of union, we would have coordination failures regarding trying to get companies to have reasonable worker standards or wages. Unless you're trying to argue that the presence of a union is a negative externality to the labor market, which I have trouble buying because minimum wage at 40 hours a week is barely enough for 1 person to be above the poverty line, and without Unions, companies don't have a major incentive to pay some workers above minimum wage.Does nobody see the irony that big unions are some of the strongest monopolies that exist in this country? Just because a cartel is controlling labor instead of oil or internet service doesn't make it a great idea for an efficient economy. Anything a union can do can be done better through law, so if we're dreaming up a perfect system then what's with the unions?
Let the free market decide.
Of course there are merits to both arguments, but if there is a mutual agreement by both sides (employer, employee) to be paid a lower wage than minimum wage then sure, I don't see why that should be a problem (ex. a part time student looking for work). With more government regulation, it'd just be harder for businesses to higher more people, simple as.