Woot
Well-known member
<tormato> you guys should think of polls
and then make them
I've never had a conversation about this topic that wasn't interesting, so I thought it would be a good poll.
Last edited by a moderator:
<tormato> you guys should think of polls
and then make them
I don't think we have enough knowledge of the universe so rule out different dimensions and energy states of the universe so idk, I wouldn't say ghost aren't real. Whether I believe they exist is a different story and I'm just going to say yes out of wishful thinking, albeit I can't say for sure
This is what I feel as well.If we do not possess evidence for something, we are well within our rights to rule it out. Until conclusive and definite proof is discovered pertaining to the existence of ghosts, it's perfectly reasonable to say that ghosts do not exist, even if there might be a possibility of someone discovering that they actually do. When such a discovery is made and adequate proof is provided, ghosts exist, but no sooner.
Our god is all knowing and has encountered a ghost.I have encountered a ghost. I was staying overnight at a friends old farmhouse and I woke late at night to see an apparition gliding from the door to the sofa I was sleeping in. It was an old bearded man. He came to the sofa bent over and looked at me before leaving the same way he came.
For this, since there was no understood message (at least from what I understand of your statement) the classification would rely on your faith. If you are a man of faith and this led you to question your trust in God or in your spirituality, then I would be inclined to see this as a Demonic appearance. Should this however have strengthened your belief in God by forcing you to come to terms with the fact your mind cannot understand the ways in which God works, than it could very well have been Heavenly.I have encountered a ghost. I was staying overnight at a friends old farmhouse and I woke late at night to see an apparition gliding from the door to the sofa I was sleeping in. It was an old bearded man. He came to the sofa bent over and looked at me before leaving the same way he came.
Holy crap.Well small children see stuff that adults don't. After the death of my wife's grandma my daughter has been talking to some "old". She constantly wants to visit the "old".
If we do not possess evidence for something, we are well within our rights to rule it out. Until conclusive and definite proof is discovered pertaining to the existence of ghosts, it's perfectly reasonable to say that ghosts do not exist, even if there might be a possibility of someone discovering that they actually do. When such a discovery is made and adequate proof is provided, ghosts exist, but no sooner.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_ignorance#Absence_of_evidence
Appeal to ignorance: the claim that whatever has not been proved false must be true, and vice versa. (e.g., There is no compelling evidence that UFOs are not visiting the Earth; therefore, UFOs exist, and there is intelligent life elsewhere in the Universe. Or: There may be seventy kazillion other worlds, but not one is known to have the moral advancement of the Earth, so we're still central to the Universe.) This impatience with ambiguity can be criticized in the phrase: absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.[3]
"If a proposition has not been disproved, then it cannot be considered false and must therefore be considered true.
If a proposition has not been proved, then it cannot be considered true and must therefore be considered false."
I believe you are displaying a logical fallacy.
Reality exists as it is, independent of whether you provide evidence for its existence. You can choose to only believe in things if you have evidence for their existence. But where things go wrong with your logic is, if an experiment is never made to determine the existence of "ghosts" then you cannot possibly know that they don't exist. You can choose to believe they do not exist, but you cannot say that they don't.
Your belief that ghosts do not exist is just that, a belief.
According to your logic, if you have no evidence that a certain plant does not provide some medicinal properties, and there was no experiment to provide evidence of absence, then you can "rule it out". Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
Basically, I believe that Heavenly and Demonic beings come to us in human forms so that we can understand their messages and that by understanding the message or the effects of the message help us to understand which kind of existence we have been exposed to.
And please, by all means, if anyone has thoughts or comments about what I said please roast away!
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, ever. That is illogical. Straight up.Absence of evidence is evidence of absence until evidence is not absent. So, as far as I'm concerned, ghosts do not exist. If someone performs an experiment proving me wrong and still I stick to my opinion, my opinion will have become a belief. Until then, as far as anyone knows, it is a fact.