As I understand it, the EU is supposed to be an economic power-union to primarily benefit the member nations by increasing communication and economic freedom for citizens underneath the EU banner.
[If that is wrong, I beg of the knights to not respond to anything beyond right here and correct me. I want to have a proper understanding of the EU so that I may form a proper conclusion on my own, rather than simply believing someone else's. However, if that was right, please continue reading and respond. ]
Therefore, I believe the EU should remain strictly that, an economic pact, and exclude itself from a multinational political agenda under the pretenses of economic growth and development.
OR drop the guise and just change the open intent of the economic union to fully and transparently embrace the European Confederation of States that they appear to already be pushing. If they want to be a multinational governing body that dabbles in the political sides of things, I don't care as long as they are honest about it. And should they go this second route, why not bring the World Court, or European Court, or however they call it, under the same banner? Judicial system, economic authority, and political power all under one flag. Why not?
I personally, if you cannot tell, am in favour of small government. In most cases I can be satisfied with a massive, corrupt, or in any other way "bad" government as long as they are mostly transparent. Not honest, but visible. I want the EU to do what it says it'll do and stop the excess or change what it says it'll do and keep up business as usual. That's it.