Ryan Miller
Active member
During the last year of World War 2 in Europe, the already crumbling German army was struggling to fight against the United States, British, Soviet, and French forces as Germany was surrounded on two fronts. At the same time, the Allies in Europe had a race to see who would reach Berlin first. Knowing that the United States was a democratic capitalist nation and the Soviet Union being a authoritarian communist nation, it would make sense to capture as much land in Europe under your influence.
The ways the United States and Britain would do was to conduct strategic bombings all throughout Germany. Operations conducted by the US Air Force and Royal Air Force would bomb factories and other targets in Germany to cripple their economy. One of the most infamous of these raids was the allied bombing of Dresden where US Air Force and the RAF would bomb Dresden. The raid was a victory for the United States and Britain as strategic targets were destroyed, however they also bombed civilians along the way. Around 20,000 Germans were killed as a result of the bombing.
One of the arguments for stating that the bombing was justified was that if would speed up the end of the war by crippling the German economy and moral. The United States wanted to make sure that most of Europe wouldn't be occupied and/or influenced by the Soviet Union. However, the counter argument would be that the war was already easy to win in the first place and carpet bombing a city was unnecessary. The raid also targeted innocent civilians along the way.
What do you think? Do you think that the allied bombing of Dresden was justified because it would speed up the end of the war, or not because thousand of innocent civilians were killed as a result?
The ways the United States and Britain would do was to conduct strategic bombings all throughout Germany. Operations conducted by the US Air Force and Royal Air Force would bomb factories and other targets in Germany to cripple their economy. One of the most infamous of these raids was the allied bombing of Dresden where US Air Force and the RAF would bomb Dresden. The raid was a victory for the United States and Britain as strategic targets were destroyed, however they also bombed civilians along the way. Around 20,000 Germans were killed as a result of the bombing.
One of the arguments for stating that the bombing was justified was that if would speed up the end of the war by crippling the German economy and moral. The United States wanted to make sure that most of Europe wouldn't be occupied and/or influenced by the Soviet Union. However, the counter argument would be that the war was already easy to win in the first place and carpet bombing a city was unnecessary. The raid also targeted innocent civilians along the way.
What do you think? Do you think that the allied bombing of Dresden was justified because it would speed up the end of the war, or not because thousand of innocent civilians were killed as a result?